Trappist Westvleteren 12: Quad Blind Tasting

For this write-up I wanted to do something a little different than a straight review. A bottle of Westy 12 was generously gifted to me, and I wanted to seize the opportunity since it is not everyday that you find yourself in possession of one of the world's most sought after and hyped up beers. If you are unfamiliar with Westy 12, good. The beer is brewed by the monks at the Trappist Abbey of Saint Sixtus in Vleteren, Belgium. The brewery makes three beers: their Blonde, 8, and 12. These beers are only available at the brewery in Belgium, which has added to the beer's hype and mythology. The Westy 12 did have a limited American release (for charity), and was absurd and a total shitshow. Since then, the trade value of Westy 12 has crashed like the US housing market. 

Having a bottle of this rare and sought after beer in my possession is like owning the Ark of the Covenant. You feel like a God, until the hype machine melts your face off. Anyway, here was the blind tasting lineup:

Trappist Westvleteren 12
Brewed By: Westvleteren Abdij St. Sixtus in Westvleteren, Belgium  

ABV: 10.2%

St. Bernardus Abt 12

Brewed By: St. Bernardus Brouwerij in Watou, Belgium  

ABV: 10.0%

Destihl Quadrupel

Brewed By: Destihl Brewery in Bloomington, Illinois  

Quad Blind Tasting 

ABV: 11.0%

Delirium Noël

Brewed By: Brouwerij Huyghe in Melle, Belgium  

ABV: 10.0%

Rochefort Trappistes 10

Brewed By: Brasserie Rochefort in Rochefort, Belgium  

ABV: 11.3%

Chimay Bleue (Blue) / Grande Réserve

Brewed By: Chimay in Baileux, Belgium  

ABV: 9.0%

Ommegang Three Philosophers

Brewed By: Brewery Ommegang (Moortgat) in Cooperstown, New York  

ABV: 9.7%

There wasn't a ton of thought behind this lineup of beers. I could have added more beers, but I wanted to keep the lineup shorter to avoid palate fatigue. I put the Destihl beer in the lineup to give the Midwest a chance. I wanted to end up saying, "local brewery does okay." Unfortunately, the Destihl Quad was clearly among the worst of these beers. Spoilers. The Abt 12 and Rochefort 10 are both easily available and I enjoy them a lot. The Chimany Blue is a classic. The Noël is a crowd favorite that I don't get. And the Three Philosophers is my favorite, readily available, American Quad. With all that said, let's see how these beers stacked up.

My blind, final ranking: Ommegang, Rochefort 10, Delirium Noël, Chimay, Abt 12, Destihl, Westy 12

My brother: Delirium Noël, Rochefort 10, Ommegang, Chimay, Abt 12, Destihl, Westy 12

My girlfriend: Ommegang, Abt 12, Delirium Noël, Chimay, Rochefort 10, Destihl, Westy 12

Average/Mean position of each beer (w/ standard deviation): 

Woo, statistics!

This was a simple tasting with just three people. And this is about as deep as I want to go. The results are pretty clear...the Three Philosophers was loved by everyone, and that doesn't surprise me. It's a top-notch Quad, despite being on the sweeter side of the style. The Delirium Noël was a total dark horse that we all enjoyed, and I'll pen some tasting notes on each of these beers in a minute. The Rochefort 10 should not shock anyone. I debated putting the Rochefort 10 in my number one spot, and my brother was right behind me in loving it. My girlfriend is hop-aversive, and we all agreed the Rochefort 10 had the most hop punch. The Chimay was middle-of-the road for ALL of us. It's a good standby, and you can buy it anywhere these days. The Abt 12 had a bit of variation in its ranking...I wonder about the bottle age. The Destihl was universally panned compared to the top beers. And then we had the Westy 12...all the way at all of our bottoms. When we were doing the blind tasting, we all thought the Westy 12 was the Delirium Noël or the Destihl.

Some tasting notes: 

Trappist Westvleteren 12 - oxidized, aged, apples, saffron, smuckers jam, phenols, leather, medium-bodied; harsh finish

St. Bernardus Abt 12 - Phenolic, banana, cherries, dark fruits, brown sugar, full-bodied; crisp; light fruity flavor, cardboard

It's just beer...

Destihl Quadrupel - sweet, light, fruity, apples, cherries, saffron, fruity/caramel, not complex; bland; harsh, not clean

Delirium Noël - Rye, spice, bread, some vinegar/soy sauce/umami, oxidized dark fruits, raisins, intensity and complex; very fruity, apple juice; raisins, very clean

Rochefort Trappistes 10 - HOPPY, resin, dark fruits, brown sugars, hop candies, BIG, not sweet; cookie dough; some alcohol

Chimay Bleue (Blue) / Grande Réserve - cherries, fruit, dark fruits, sweeetness, lighter, thin; apples and pears; smooth

Ommegang Three Philosophers - Bananas, phenolic, perfume, brown sugar, cherries, candies, candy sugar, thick, sweet, not boozy; bananas; slightly bitter

Results/Discussion/Conclusion/Final Thoughts

What to make of these results? I really don't know. First off, Belgian Strong Ales are one of my favorite styles of beer, if not my absolute favorite style of beer. Having said that, I think tasting these beers in a blind tasting format is restrictive in some ways. By the end of the tasting, my palate was whacked and I was having a hard time discerning between beers. There's some meta commentary there about the hoarders on Ratebeer that tick 200 beers a day, or go to festivals and rate 40 beers using 2oz pours. People are both the best raters of things like food and drink, and also poorly tuned instruments. There are so many biases at work -- your mood, your palate that day, how many beers you had before, etc. -- that I just can't take tickers seriously. What I am proposing is a premise/argument that the ticker on Ratebeer with 20,000+ ticks is contributing meaningless content and is wasting time. But hey, if they are happy, good for them.

These are ALL nuanced beers. The Abt 12 has different complexities than the Rochefort 10. The Delirium Noël is way different than any other of these beers. I would argue that none of these beers are bad. You could go into the store and walk out with any of these beers and be okay. However, for my palate, I'm quite content knowing that I can buy an Ommegang Three Philosophers or a Rochefort 10 at just about any liquor store, and get that authentic dark strong ale experience without having to jump through any hoops. I've rated both the Three Philosophers and Rochefort 10 very high in the past. 

The Delirium Noël is the real dark horse in this tasting. Many "what the fucks?" were made after it scored so high. My theory behind the beer's success is that it is complex, has these awesome bread/rye notes, and pulls out some serious raisin punches. The vinegar/soy/umami that I was tuned into (my tasting partners were not) suggests to me that the beer has suffered from some autolysis...Delirium bottle-conditions all of their beers, and you can pour out some really nasty yeast chunks if you aren't careful. Who knows how old that bottle is.

Why did we all pan the Westy 12? I have no idea. I didn't pan it, initially. I actually had it ranked in the 4th spot before finalizing my rankings. I think the bottle I have might have some age on it. But also, the Westy 12 wasn't as assertive or bold as the Rochefort 10 or the Ommegang Three Philosophers. I won't speak much to the hype...because this blind tasting was limited. We only had one bottle. And there are biases at work. So maybe in another blind tasting we would rank it higher. Maybe in another blind tasting we would have a bottle that tastes different. There is definitely bottle variation with this style of beer. So there are a lot of unknowns and limitations at work here. Also, our sample size was too small and hardly significant. To legitimize this tasting, we would ideally have 20 people tasting these beers. That should provide more useful data...but I did what I could.

And that's all I really have to say. This blind tasting was fun, and I recommend that people jump on this ship and start blind tasting beers themselves. Beer reviews ARE bullshit. But blind tastings add an element of credibility to what is otherwise a lot of words. Words. Ratebeer. 20,000 ticks. Tick tick tick tick. Tick.

Random Thought: WHAT?!!?! No review score? Duh. How the hell am I supposed to rate these beers from a blind tasting? Also, I can't speak for my compadres. 

Small Town Brewery Not Your Father's Root Beer (5.9%)

Brewed By: Small Town Brewery in Wauconda, IL  

Purchased: 12oz bottle from a 6-pack bought at Jewel-Osco in Chicago, IL; 2014 

Style/ABV: Malt Beverage, 5.9%

Reported IBUs: ?

If you need proof that beer geeks have a strong overlap with alcoholics, look no further than the Small Town Brewery and Not Your Father's Root Beer. Not Your Father's Root Beer is an alcoholic root beer that punches in at 5.9%, 10.7%, and 19.5%. You can guess which one beer geeks seek out. I have never quaffed the 19.5%...and maybe that's a good thing. I have no problem pounding 12oz draft pours of the 10.7% version. The beer is not only smooth as hell, but it has some of the best root beer flavor I have ever had. It's legitimately better than non-alcoholic root beer, as the alcohol brings a peppery spice and extra dimension of flavor. And did I mention this stuff is tasty? It makes Sprecher's Hard Root Beer look really crappy. Anyway, about Small Town Brewery:

Small Town Brewery is a small brewery based out of Wauconda, IL. The brewery was founded in 2010, and have become notorious for their boozy root beer. For more info, hit up their website or Facebook page. 

The 5.9% version of Not Your Father's Root Beer is available year-round, and at this point in time I am having no trouble finding it on shelves. As these things go, this really isn't a beer...but you know, fuck it. That wine tag...they see my trollin'.

Not Your Father's Root Beer (5.9%)

The aroma on this is serious root beer with big vanilla, wood, medicinal spice, sassafras, cough syrup, molasses, and some serious cola. There is that amusement park candied sugar aspect, and big hard root beer candies. It's like a blast into my childhood, so I have to give this thing credit for making me drunk and making me feel like I'm 12.

As you can imagine, this tastes like root beer. This is super sweet, sugary, one-dimensional...but this is also really fucking good. It's like a top-tier root beer, with alcohol. You get that spicy bite up front, with some medicinal elements, sassafras, cola, dark fruits; the mids roll into more spice and some bubble gum sweetness; the back end dials up wood, vanilla, root beer candies, and tons of sugar. 

There's not much to say...this isn't complex, but the palate depth is really good. This is basically a stickier, sweeter version of root beer...with alcohol. It is ridiculous how drinkable this is, and that scales up with the higher alcohol version as well. And by scales up I mean scales up inversely. Honestly, the 10.7% is the smoothest 10.7% thing I have ever consumed. Dangerous stuff. 

Rating: Divine Brew (4.5/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Divine Brew on this. There is a slightly grapey flavor in here that was present in the Sprecher Hard Root Beer that you don't get when you have this beer on tap (or at least the 10.7% version). It's not a problem though, and sort of integrates into this beer. It's definitely a component in a good root beer, but when it runs away it can cause trouble. In this case, no trouble. You can pair this stuff with anything, but I'm partial to sipping on it after a meal while watching TV or whatever. And by sipping I mean drinking the whole 6-pack. Damn.

Random Thought: So now that the Bear's season is over, I need to figure out who to root for. Suggestions are welcomed. 

Two Brothers Atom Smasher [REDUX]

Brewed By: Two Brothers Brewing Company in Warrenville, Illinois

Purchased: 12oz bottle from a 4-pack bought at Jewel-Osco in Chicago, IL; 2014 (2014 vintage)

Style/ABV: American-Style Oktoberfest, 7.7%
Reported IBUs: 22.6

Holy shit. I can't believe my review of this beer from 2011. That's right...back in 2011, back when I thought I was hot shit, I reviewed the Atom Smasher. And at that time, I thought this beer was pretty solid. Since then, I have been seeking this beer out every year. I figured it was time to give my updated thoughts on it. About Two Brothers:

Two Brothers are based out of Warrenville, Illinois, a town not far from Chicago. Two brothers was founded in 1996 by brother Jason and Jim Ebel. Their brewery and Tap House Restaurant are both located in Warrenville. Their distribution and production seems to be increasing with each year, and along with their beer you can buy home brewing equipment and supplies at the Tap House Restaurant. If you get the chance, swing by and check out their Roundhouse. It's an awesome joint, and needs all the love it can get. For more information, check out their about page/website.

The Atom Smasher is part of the Two Brothers' "J Series" of beers. This Oktoberfest-style beer has a unique twist: it is aged in Oak Foudres. 

You're probably wondering why I'm doing a redux review of this beer, or why I even care enough to review it twice. After all, the Oktoberfest style is one of the most boring styles of beer. Well, I'm here to tell you...this is probably the best Oktoberfest available in the Midwest. Or at least in Chicago and the state of Illinois.

Two Brothers Atom Smasher [REDUX]

I mean, just look at that dark orange/copper body. Look at that caramel head. This beer is several shades darker than most Oktoberfests, and deposits brilliant alcohol legs which hint at the 7.7% lurking beneath. 

The aroma here is equally intriguing. The oak foudres contribute very subtle notes on the nose with gentle vanilla, oak, and wood coming through in the aroma. You also get huge caramel sugars, toast, and big nuttiness. This beer is exceptionally nutty, and it does veer into weird pork/sausage aromas. The whole aroma is backed by dried berries and suggestive fruity notes. It's a complex aroma, it's sweet, it's nutty, it's fruity, it's oaky...it smells fucking amazing. And it's just an Oktoberfest!

This also tastes incredibly complex...and not just for the style. As a beer, in general, this is very complex. There are molasses, dark sugar, oak, vanilla, caramel, berries, nuts, and dried berries at work in this beer. The beer lingers for a while, driven by some bitter hops and toasted notes, and then lingers with sweet sugars and lingering barrel. The main characters here are -- of course -- sweet and malty. And there's plenty of that; big caramel, oak, vanilla, and malty sugars. There are also nice bready notes in here. But this is really a big, flavorful beer. And it better be at 7.7%.

I'd call this beer medium-full bodied. It's not quite Stout, but it is thick and it is sweet. You might not guess this is 7.7%, and you might not guess this is barrel-aged. But in terms of the style, this is "off." The barrel-aging compromises the Oktoberfest character just slightly, and for the better. The barrel adds complexity, and this beer is definitely complex. It also has great palate depth. Up front are sugar, caramel, oak, vanilla, and barrel; the mids roll into dried berries, hops, dark fruits, toast, nuttiness; the back end trails with nuttiness, lingering oak/vanilla, and sugary sweetness. If all Oktoberfest beers were this good, the style would be more popular. This is my desert island Oktoberfest.

Rating: Divine Brew (5.0/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Strong Divine Brew on this. This is probably the best Oktoberfest I have had. It is certainly the best Oktoberfest in the Midwest, or at least in Illinois. Maybe you are thinking to yourself: "But wait! This beer is aged in oak foudres! That is cheating." Well, you know what? Fuck you. Seriously. If the Germans want to start aging their Oktoberfest in oak barrels, I support that decision. This is a style that bores me to tears, and here we find Two Brothers injecting some new life into it. This is a blissful, fantastic beer. I literally buy a 6-pack of this every Fall. This beer pairs well with cooler weather, football, and any German meal you can throw at it. I'm talking about sausage, bratwurst, sauerkraut, pretzel bun sandwiches...anything. It's also cheap at around $10 a 6-pack. So good. 

Random Thought: Dear Two Brothers, please continue to make this beer forever. It is one of your best beers, by a long shot. Regards. 

A quick Beer Camp 2014 meta-analysis. Was it really that bad?

I posed a hypothetical question to myself while driving home the other afternoon. "What if the Beer Camp 2014 didn't advertise Sierra Nevada's involvement with the 12 beers?" Would it matter? Maybe not, since Sierra Nevada is beloved by all. Even the most pretentious beer snobs will find something redeeming about Sierra Nevada. And they should, Sierra Nevada is a good brewery. They are also "the West Coast" brewery. Or one of them. And everyone loves the West Coast. Well, almost everyone. 

I digress. 

This year's Beer Camp mix-pack was a success. People are buying it. It's selling out. It's a craft beer commodity. When the craft beer children want something, they get it. They'll wait in line at a brewery after driving hundreds of miles. They'll package up their valuables and ship them halfway across the country. And in the case of Beer Camp 2014, there was no shortage of threads in the regional BeerAdvocate Forums asking questions like, "has anyone seen Beer Camp in [insert location here]." 

Yeah, it sold out. But how the fuck does it taste?! 

Does it matter? No, seriously. Think about the logistics of assembling this mix-pack. Sierra Nevada collaborated with 12 breweries, many of whom are as far away from California as can be. The spread here includes breweries from Florida, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and California. Many of these breweries, if not all of them, are popular and already operating on thin margins in terms of space and time. New Glarus doesn't even ship out of Wisconsin, and yet here we find them being distributed on a national level, just for that one time. How cool is that? 

Apparently...not that cool. If the response from the beer community is any indication, the 2014 Beer Camp has been middle-of-the-road. A dissapoint[ment]. A mix-pack full of average beers. I'll ask again: even if these are middling beers, does it matter?

Your typical beer Vlogger (not pictured: a line of expensive #whalez)

Beer Camp, the festival and the mix-pack, is a celebration of beer in America. I don't think the target demographic for this mix-pack was the fat neckbeards that display their bottles of expensive and rare beers when they film their shitty video beer reviews. The target demographic for this mix-pack wasn't the pretentious Double-IPA critics, or people who are looking for barrel-aged beers where the barrel has been aged inside another barrel for that extra meta rareness. 

In an ideal world, I'd like to think Sierra Nevada was marketing this beer towards the every man/woman. Imagine if you could sell a few of these Beer Camp mix-packs to the Joe Average-guy who buys the Sam Adams seasonal variety packs. The Beer Camp is so much better. The Beer Camp is simultaneously a gateway and celebration of craft beer...something you can hang your hat on and say, "fuck yeah, America, titties, craft beer." It's like everything Magic Hat envisioned when they started releasing variety packs, without the Magic Hat. So it's better. 

So, it's super disappointing to see reviews of this mix-pack complaining about the price, or the bottled-on dates, or whatever. Yeah, the Chico King Pale Ale sucked, and it tasted faded. But the rest of this mix-pack was on its game. And complaining about the price? Really? These complaints are coming from the same people that will drop $30 on 750ml of beer. Move your yeard out of the way, push your man tits together, and harden the fuck up. And FYI: no one cares if you don't fancy English-style Bitters, Scottish Ales, or Altbiers. This mix-pack has all three, and all three are pretty good. 

I'm gonna stop...this is an early morning rant, typed up between a cup of coffee and my morning dump. But while we are talking about how not bad the 2014 Beer Camp was, here was my breakdown of the mix-pack. This much needed meta analysis will help to stimulate my brain and colon. Here's how the 2014 Beer Camp stacks up:

1. Double Latte Coffee Milk Stout Divine Brew (Decent) 4.5/5
2. Tater Ridge Scottish Ale Above-Average (Strong) 4.5/5
3. CANfusion Rye Bock Above-Average (Light) 4.5/5
4. Maillard's Odyssey Imperial Dark Ale Above-Average (Strong) 4/5
5. Alt Route Altbier Above-Average (Strong) 4/5
6. Yonder Bock Tropical Maibock Above-Average (Decent) 4/5
7. Torpedo Pilsner Hoppy Pilsner Above-Average (Decent) 4/5
8. Electric Ray India Pale Lager Above-Average (Light) 4/5
9. There and Back English-Style Bitter Above-Average (Light) 3.5/5
10. Yvan The Great Belgian-Style Blonde Above-Average (Light) 3.5/5
11. Myron's Walk Belgian-Style Pale Ale Average (Strong) 3.5/5
12. Chico King Pale Ale Average (Light) 3/5

Out of 12 beers, there was a total of 60 potential points available. When you add up all the scores, the final total is: 47/60, or a percentage score of 78.3%. If you take the mean/average, you end up with a final score of 3.9/5.0. You know, for all you Untappd people. 

That's not a bad final score. It's somewhere between average and closer to above-average, which is where I feel this mix-pack stands out. And while there were no perfectly scored beers in this mix-pack, the Ninkasi collab comes pretty damn close with a 4.5/5.0. It also stands out as the only Divine Brew in the mix-pack. I feel confident calling it world-class (like that means anything). It's a good beer if you like coffee stouts. 

Other favorites include the Tater Ridge, which was a nice take on the Scotch/Scottish Ale style. It had substantial body and a welcomed sweetness that would fit right at home in an Autumn beer. The CANfusion Rye Bock was also delicious, with a nice blend of complex malts and interesting hops. The Maillard's Odyssey and Electric Ray should also get serious props, although both beers fail in terms of being original or classics. 

The biggest losers here are clearly the Chico King and the Yvan The Great. Even if the Chico King was bottled closer to the release, I'm confident the beer wouldn't have done anything other than middled it. What a disappointing beer...and honestly, it's not surprising when you look at some of the underwhelming stuff FFF has been shoving into bombers as of late. And selling for high prices. I still love Three Floyds and no one does it better...but come on. The Russian River and Sierra Nevada collab was also a huge disappointment. The bottle promised a great experience and the beer was average and hardly innovative. The fact that Sierra Nevada and Russian River are neighbors doesn't help their case either. These two breweries could have collaborated to make something really outstanding...but oh well.

Last but not least, let's talk about the There and Back English-Style Bitter. I thought this skirted by as an Above-Average take on the style. Honestly, New Glarus crafted a delicious beer with this one, it just so happens that the Bitter style isn't particularly exciting for most American beer drinkers. Having said that, New Glarus' regular lineup of beers (including their seasonal offerings) features a bunch of Bocks and Lagers...boring beers by many accounts...but beers that are crafted masterfully. While New Glarus has gained notoriety for their sours and fruit beers, their regular lineup is stellar stuff. There and Back is no exception and pretty much embodies what they do. 

With that said...it's August. The Beer Camp 2014 has probably peaked. I don't know if I would still seek this out given that some of the beers were bottled as early as May. At this point in time (8/8/2014), I'd pay no more than ~$24 for the 12-pack. If you were fortunate enough to jump on this one in early July like I was, then you were rewarded with a fun celebration of American craft beer.

I hope Sierra Nevada reads this post and ignores a lot of the lazy reviews and beer snobbery that has surrounded this release. And then hopefully they mail me free shit. Sierra Nevada, email me: Cums4Hops69@hotmail.com

Also, I look forward to Beer Camp 2015

Crabbie's Spiced Orange Ginger Beer

Brewed By: John Crabbie & Company in Edinburgh, Scotland 
Purchased: Single 11.2oz bottle from a 4-pack bought at Jewel-Osco in Chicago, IL; 2014
Style/ABV: Ginger Beer, 4.8%

Reported IBUs: 45

I'm not gonna lie, I like Ginger Beer. About John Crabbie & Company:

John Crabbie & Company are based out of Edinburgh, Scotland, and were founded by the Scottish merchant, John Crabbie. Crabbie first imported ginger into the port of Leith, Edinburgh, in 1801, to make "the beverage from the Far East." The method that Crabbie used to make the ginger beer is still used today. 

The Crabbie's Spiced Orange Ginger Beer is a mix of zesty ginger and orange. How can this not taste delicious. This pours a clear, amber-orange, ginger ale-color, and kicks up a finger or two of ginger ale-tinted head. There's actually some sustaining head, and nice carbonation in here.

The aroma is a nice blend of alcohol, ginger ale, ginger soda, spiced ginger notes, spiced notes that remind me of rum (yum), and spicy ginger-orange. It smells and looks really refined, mature, and good. 

And this actually tastes quite nice. I rolled through three of these with ease last Friday afternoon while working around the apartment, and I eventually paired this with some slow-cooked barbecued pork chops. The pairing was fantastic, and this shit is legit. You get lots of big ginger on the palate, with big orange notes as the supporting character. There's nice tingly ginger spice that burns down the back of your mouth into the depths of your throat. It's got a pretty good ginger soda kick. My only hesitation with this one is that it's kind of sweet. Again, I drank three of these in one afternoon with no problem, so maybe it tastes sweeter than it actually is.

This is a light and refreshing, and simple in terms of palate and complexity. It's basically a malt liquor. It's a good one though. There's a nice balance between ginger heat and sweet orange in here, and subtle notes of orange, vanilla, spiced rum, star anise, and curry show up in the taste. It's not something I'd buy on the regular, but this is a foodie drink that would work well in the right time at the right place. Recommended. 

Rating: Above-Average (4.0/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Above-Average here. This is a solid ginger beer, and the addition of orange adds a fun twist. It could use a little more ginger heat and a little less sweetness, but whatever. I think Stone should make a ginger beer...that is right up their alley. Food pairings here include Thai or Indian food, but I recommend pairing this with sweet barbecued pork chops. The orange and ginger provide balance that compliments the gamy pork and the sweet barbecue sauce.

Random Thought: And if you were wondering, I was on vacation! That's my excuse. RIP, liver. 

Sprecher Hard Root Beer

Brewed By: Sprecher Brewing Company in Glendale, Wisconsin  

Purchased: 12oz bottle from a 4-pack bought at Jewel-Osco in Chicago, IL; 2014 

Style/ABV: Malt Beverage, 5.0%

Reported IBUs: ?

I've seen Sprecher's Hard Root Beer sitting on shelves for ages, so I decided to pick some up at a ridiculous price of $5.00 a 4-pack. About Sprecher: 

The Sprecher Brewing Compnay is a brewery based out of Glendale, Wisconsin. The company was founded in 1985 by Randal Sprecher, who was a brewing supervisor at Pabst Brewing Company. During 1985 to 1994, the brewery was located at 730 W. Oregon Street in Milwaukee, but the company outgrew its original facility and moved to Glendale in 1994. For more info, check out the brewery's history page. 

The Sprecher Hard Root Beer is "not your granddaddy's root beer." This is the adult version of their famous root beer.

Sprecher Hard Root Beer

The Hard Foot Beer pours out looking exactly like regular root beer, only with a couple of fingers of tan head. The head, surprisingly, sticks around for the long haul. This stuff is cola-like with a brown/purple body. In bright light, the beer takes on a swampy and murky brown appearance.

On the aroma: big root beer, some woody character, lots of spice. There's some nice sassafras, licorice, a little cherry/grape, and lots of cola goodness. It smells surprisingly earthy and medicinal, like good root beer, with minimal sweetness on the nose. 

This is pretty tasty, but right up front is a really sweet and spicy note that tastes like sweet grape or maraschino cherry, or something. Once that sweet note passes, you're hit with big wood, fired barrels, and then HUGE oak, vanilla, sassafras, more gentle vanilla, medicinal spice, and root beer. It's like...Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The front half of this beverage is overtly sweet and somewhat turbulent, but the back end delivers the goods. It's kind of a shame that it doesn't ride out the good vibes from start to finish. 

This has a medium-bodied mouthfeel, with good palate depth, duration, and complexity. It's actually pretty tasty as far as malt beverages go, and things move along with lots of carbonation. This isn't overly sweet at 5.0%, and that works to this drink's advantage. The only issue for me is the front 1/3 of this malt beverage. Up front: Overt sweetness, grapes, maraschino cherries, sweetness; that rolls into a decadent middle that features medicinal spice, oak, vanilla, barrel, wood, brilliant root beer and cola; the back end lingers with oak and vanilla, and cleans up nicely. You want to take another sip, and as you drink it the front end becomes less obnoxious.

Rating: Average (3.5/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Strong Average here...this is a solid malt beverage, but nothing mind blowing. Compared to Small Town Brewery's Not Your Father's Root Beer, this has some work to do. But, that's not to say this is bad. It isn't. I'm really enjoying this, and it continues to sit on shelves everywhere. At the relatively cheap price this is sold for, and at the sessionable ABV, I could see myself picking this up for social gatherings and summer barbecues. I can't not recommend this, it's just a fun malt beverage.

Random Thought: Dat Not Your Father's Root Beer is fucking delicious. 

[Cellar Review] Samuel Adams Griffin's Bow Oaked Blonde Barleywine Ale (Vintage 2012)

Brewed By: Boston Beer Company in Boston, Massachusetts 
Purchased: 22oz bottle bought at Binny's in IL; [Batch No. 2] 2012
Style/ABV: American Barleywine, 10.0%

Reported IBUs: 45

Back on February 8, 2013, I reviewed the Sam Adam's Griffin's Bow. This inexpensive American Barleywine is both tasty and exotic. Brewed with Nelson Sauvin and Zeus hops, and aged on (or with) toasted oak, the Griffin's Bow is a creative take on the American Barleywine and part of Sam Adam's small batch series of beer. About Sam Adams:

The Boston Brewing Company/Sam Adams is, of course, the brain child of Jim Koch (and Harry M. Rubin and Lorenzo Lamadrid). Founded in 1984, Jim Koch got the ball rolling after college when he decided to resurrect and brew his favorite family recipe. That recipe belonged to his great-great grandfather, Louis Koch, and dates back to the 1870s (where it was brewed in a St. Louis brewery). That infamous family brew is the Sam Adams Boston Lager, of course. You can read more about the history of the Boston Brewing Company HERE, or check out their website HERE.  

Why age this beer? Good question. The bottle says: "Enjoy now or age it to further develop rich and unique flavors." The bottle also notes on the back: "From the aroma and notes of sweet honeysuckle, pineapple, and grapefruit, to richer hints of burnt sugar, and toffee, this intriguing brew is full of complex flavors. The distinct character of toasted oak adds depth and contrasts the light fruit sweetness. This unique take on a barleywine ale surprises with its smoothness and balance of fruit, hop citrus, and warmth." 

With that said, let's get this late 2012 vintage into a glass and see how a little over a year has done to this beer. 

Sam Adams Griffin's Bow (Vintage 2012)

This pours into a hazy, golden-orange body, and kicks up two fingers of dense, sustaining, golden-tinted head. Bright light confirms the hazy orange goodness, and you can see peppery dots of carbonation slowly ascending. Let me reiterate: head retention is really good here, with a finger still hanging around. There's plenty of lacing too. 

Even with the passion fruit/grape you'd expect from the Nelson Sauvin, I'm mostly getting pine, pine sap, caramel, toasted sugars, toasted oak, oak, and maybe some leafy hop aromas. There's some resin on the nose, and maybe some grape leaves, but there's lots of toasted sugars, sugar, and even a little grain/wood/coconut. 

As far the taste goes...this is inviting and warm, with lots of resinous pine, pine sap, and maple syrup up front; and some nice toasty oak, coconut, and toasted grains in the back. I wish this was a bit more complex, but it feels mellowed out at this point in time. There's a slightly harsh and astringent bitterness in here that I can't quite place a finger on...maybe a toasted grain character that shows up mid palate with some hop bitterness, before the beer mellows out into the oak in the back. Once you hit that oak note, you can dial up the wood and grain and things are okay. 

This is full-bodied, with lazy carbonation. It would be smooth and creamy if not for the sugary body that almost pulls like a mead or heavy wine. It's never cloying (imo), and you don't feel the full burden of the 10%. Still, this is a sipper through and through. Complexity is moderate, but the palate depth here leaves a bit to be desired. I feel like this beer could be more expansive and feature more depth across the front to back. Up front you get lots of resinous, sugar-coated pine sap, maple syrup, piney notes, caramel, brown sugar; the mids roll into more sugars, and then you get a bitter and astringent woody note, some grains, bitter hops; the back end is pleasant with nice oak, wood, coconut, toasted oak, toasted grains, lingering fruity sweetness. It's okay.

Rating: Average (3.0/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Average on this beer. I seem to recall enjoying the slightly more when it was fresh. The zesty pineapple notes you get from the hops when this beer is fresh cuts through a bit of the cloying sweetness that has now come out after a year of letting the hops drop off. It's not bad though...I would definitely recommend aging one of these for fun, especially at $7 or $8 a bottle. Food pairings here include creme brulee, fruit cake, fig pudding, and heavily grilled meats and sausages. 

Random Thought: As predicted yesterday, my run tonight was horrible. I guess a weekend of drinking to the point of a hangover will do that to you. 

[Cellar Review] Dogfish Head 75 Minute IPA (Vintage 2012)

Brewed By: Dogfish Head Brewery in Milton, Delaware

Purchased: 750ml (1 pint, 9.4oz) bottle bought at Evolution Wine & Spirits in Chicago, IL; 2013 (Bottled In: 2012G 03:37 aka December 2012???)

Style/ABV: Imperial IPA, 7.5% 

Reported IBUs: 75

Maple syrup? Check. Cellared beer? Check. Awww yis. About Dogfish Head:

Dogfish Head is a craft brewery based out of Milton, Delaware. The brewery was founded by Sam Calagione back in 1995. The brewery began as a brewpub (the first in Delaware) called Dogfish Head Brewings & Eats, and was originally located in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. The initial brewing setup included three kegs and propane burners. They brewed 12-gallon batches of beer three times a day, five days a week. In 1996 the brewery began bottling their beer, and by 1999 they had distribution to around a dozen different states. In 2002 the company outgrew their Rehoboth location, and moved to Milton, Delaware. More info can be found HERE. You can also check out the brewery's Facebook page, Instagram, Twitter, or Google Page. 

A little over a year ago, I reviewed the Dogfish Head 75 Minute IPA. The 75 Minute IPA is a fantastic beer, blending the 60 and 90 Minute IPA, and adding a little maple syrup and dry hop goodness. You're probably wondering why I chose to age a 7.5% IPA, and that's a good question, Scotty. There was no real reason behind this decision, other than the beer is (1) bottle conditioned, (2) fortified with maple syrup, and (3) a Dogfish Head IPA. I find Dogfish Heads heavier IPAs to be a bit cakey and malty, and I'm hoping this one holds up like one of your French Barleywines. I'll paint it like one anyway. 

Because this comes in a 750ml, Dogfish Head opted to use one of those confusing dating codes. This one has a "Bottled on 2012G" marking. I assume that means this is a 2012 vintage, and word on the street was that the "G batch" was brewed in December. Don't quote me on that, but the timeline matches up with my original review. 

Dogfish Head 75 Minute IPA (Vintage 2012)

Unlike last night, I was a little more prepared for some gushing action. This one did prematurely pop like teenage boys, but there was no fountain. This one pours into a super juicy and super hazy honey-amber body. There are gorgeous gold and honey tones, and the beer kicks up three fingers of gorgeous, honey-tinted head. It's a good looking beer, and it hardly looks like it has been worked over in the cellar. In bright light the beer is a vibrant orange with yellow tones, and there are streams of tiny carbonation visible in the mix. 

The aroma is faded and subtle and not very prominent. That's a mild concern, but I'm happy to report that I am getting some Barleywine-esque pine and syrup on the nose, along with some mild maple syrup, caramel, cakey malts, and a faint cakey citrus note (sweet orange candies). There's also maybe a hint of oxidation on the nose.

The taste isn't bad...this is actually pretty interesting. It's just very toned down and one note. This beer was banging fresh, but now it's settled into something super mellow. I'm getting mellow pine, cakey malts, honey, maple syrup, bread, light oxidation, and the whole package is super gentle. It's almost vinous at this point, like a honey or maple syrup mead. There's lots of carbonation, which really helps stimulate your tongue and move things along, and the very faint pine notes are of the pleasant variety. Oxidation is on its way but this still tastes good. There is no paper and no ass pennies to be found here. 

This is fantastically mild, with a medium-light mouthfeel that is well-carbonated and leaning towards the malty. The malts aren't overbearing or sweet, which is really interesting. This is actually a really interesting beer to try aged, it's just not very bold or bright. Palate depth is good with good duration and intensity, the complexity is rock-bottom low with a one note theme. Up front: maple/honey/pine sap and pine; the mids roll into more honey and pine sap, with subtle cake and bread; the back end finishes with lingering honey, pine sap, and syrup. It almost reminds me of a wine or something aged on oak.  

Rating: Average (3.0/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Average on this experiment. What I like about this is the gentle malts that aren't overly sweet or overbearing. That's an impressive quality you don't find in many beers. It really reminds me of a wine or even a malty Scotch Ale aged in oak. It's a really gentle, nice flavor...proof that putting honey or maple syrup into your beer can only result in good things. Like Hopslam, this is a beer best consumed fresh. When this beer is fresh, you get a brilliant interplay between bold hops, cakey malts, and the maple syrup. I'm happy I gave aging this a shot, but I wouldn't do it again. Food pairings here: bread pudding, dessert foods, anything with pine nuts, risotto, and yeah.

Random Thought: I really like the 90 Minute and 60 Minute IPAs. But the 75 Minute IPA is in its own class of awesome. Dogfish Head needs to brew that beer more regularly. 

[Cellar Review] Pipeworks Santa vs. Unicorn (American Barleywine Style Ale) (Vintage 2013)

Brewed By: Pipeworks Brewing in Chicago, IL  

Purchased: 22oz bottle (Batch #79) bought at Binny's in IL; 2013 (bottled 01.22.2013)

Style/ABV: Imperial Red Ale/American Barleywine, 10.0%
Reported IBUs: ?

It is hard to believe that it has been over one year since I began reviewing Pipeworks' beers. Back in the January of 2013, I reviewed the Pipeworks Santa vs. Unicorn. I found the beer to be superbly underwhelming. For fun, I thought, "why the hell not, I'll age a bottle."

So I bought another bottle. If you are a keen reader/observer, you'll note that the beer I am reviewing tonight is from the Batch #79 release. The beer I reviewed back in January 2013 was from Batch #64. The two batches were brewed close enough together that I doubt it matters much, plush this shitty blog is far and away from a perfect science. You've been warned.

About Pipeworks:

Pipeworks has humble roots. The brewery was founded in Chicago in 2011 by Beejay Oslon and Gerrit Lewis. The duo were both homebrewers that met while while working at West Lakeview Liquors. In 2011, they began to raise money for their brewery using the online Internet site, Kickstarter. Olson and Lewis were both educated at De Struise Brewery in Oostvleteren, Belgium. With that knowledge, and the money from their kickstarter, Olson and Lewis created a unique brewery that is smaller in size, and intended to brew smaller batches of beer. The company's motto is "small batches, big beers." And indeed, since the brewery has been around, they've been releasing a lot of one-offs and small batch releases. The goal is to release a new beer every week. You can read more about the brewery at their website HERE.

I have some serious reservations about aging Pipeworks' beers, especially their early batches. BUT, to the credit of Pipeworks, the beers I have held on to for extended periods of time did hold up well. Specifically the Raspberry Truffle Abduction, which was a delight half a year later. 

Tonight's beer was brewed for the Winter, but has made several appearances with possible recipe tweaks and slightly different names. A much improved version of this beer was released in July of 2013; the Sam Vs Unicorn found Pipeworks channeling their inner Lagunitas. The Sam Vs Unicorn was a fantastically hoppy, spicy, malty, Imperial Red...the type of shit that I salivate over. I do love my Imperial Reds. Imperial Reds flirt with American Barleywines, but are so much better. I'm really curious to see how this one has held up to age. 

Without further ado. And if you care what is on the back of this bottle, go read my review for Batch #64. The print is identical. 

Pipeworks Santa vs. Unicorn (Vintage 2013)

As I kind of anticipated, this one gushed on the pour. That's what happens when you age a conditioned beer for a year and then open it up on the warmer side of cellar temps. This one pours into an absolutely swampy orange-red-brown haze. This one is practically opaque, with big juicy brown/orange tones in bright light. It's like a Ween album, weirdly appealing and off-putting at the same time. This one also kicked up a finger of caramel-tinted head that is sustaining quite nicely with a centimeter coating. There's some lacing as well.

How about that aroma though! Wow, this thing has improved with age. At least per my previous tasting notes. I'm getting huge cakey malts, pine sap, maple syrup, waffle house, pine, and pine tar. There is some big hop resin lurking beneath, with resinous grapefruit and lemon making an appearance on the nose. There's good sweetness on the aroma, with caramel, brown sugar, and balanced treacle goodness ala a well-crafted, aged, American Barleywine. 

The taste fails to live up to the awesome aroma, but it's a big improvement over the beer that I reviewed back in 2013 and said "meh" to. This one has a nice body, especially for the style. American Barleywines can be quite heavy-handed, but this has lots of carbonation, with a full-bodied thinness, and just a touch of oxidation. The balance here has shifted from hop-forward into deep caramel sugars, but there are still plenty of hops present. I'm getting big pine, pine sap, maple syrup, treacle sweetness, nuttiness, pine nuts, brown sugars, burnt caramel, more burnt caramel, even more burnt caramel...serious up-thumbs for the dark sugars in here, it's almost Belgian-esque and that is fucking awesome. I don't even know how or why, but I like it. There's some resinous and sappy lemon and citrus hanging around in the taste, but this one mostly dials in that pine-maple-caramel trifecta.

To reiterate, this is full-bodied but on the thinner and more drinkable side, especially for the style. I think this beer toes the line of a true American Barleywine, where the Sam Vs Unicorn is more of an Imperial Red. Palate depth here is good, and this one has good duration. Complexity is low to average, or maybe not. I'm not a huge fan of American Barleywines, but I'm digging this. You don't pick up any of the 10%. There's a lotta pine sap, maple syrup, and caramel sugars up front; that rolls into nuttiness, pine nuts, more pine sap, resinous lemon, bitterness, burnt caramel; the back end continues to layer the dark sugars and burnt caramel, and the finish is surprisingly bitter and piney. Picture the Canadian woods: cabins, brown bears, stalking sorority chicks. That's this beer.

Rating: Above-Average (3.5/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Above-Average...I'll toss this a bone for just being a fun experiment. This isn't quite as refined or complex as a Sierra Nevada Bigfoot or whatever classic Barleywine comes to your mind, but at the same time it's not really far behind. I found this beer to be really disappointing fresh, but what I have here now is drinking really good. I'd pay $10.99 to age one of these again. Food pairings here: anything with pine nuts, including stuffed mushrooms, risotto, nutty desserts, and maybe even chicken and waffles. 

Random Thought: I don't understand American Barleywines. I have such a love/hate relationship with the style. 

[Cellar Review] Samuel Adams Imperial White (Imperial Series) (Vintage 2012)

Brewed By: Boston Beer Company in Boston, Massachusetts 
Purchased: Single bottle (12oz) from a 4-pack bought at Jewel in Chicago, IL; 2012 
Style/ABV: (Imperial) Witbier, 10.3%

Reported IBUs: 15

Tonight's beer should be a lot of fun. Back in 2012, I cracked into a bottle of the Sam Adams Imperial White. I found the beer to be equal parts cloyingly sweet, boozy, and over-the-top. It's a divisive brew, even by my own standards. But I'm curious to see how this one has held up down the stretch. About Sam Adams:

The Boston Brewing Company/Sam Adams is, of course, the brain child of Jim Koch (and Harry M. Rubin and Lorenzo Lamadrid). Founded in 1984, Jim Koch got the ball rolling after college when he decided to resurrect and brew his favorite family recipe. That recipe belonged to his great-great grandfather, Louis Koch, and dates back to the 1870s (where it was brewed in a St. Louis brewery). That infamous family brew is the Sam Adams Boston Lager, of course. You can read more about the history of the Boston Brewing Company HERE, or check out their website HERE.  

The Imperial White has since changed from its 4-pack, 12oz format. Now part of the Sam Adams Small Batch series, this beer is described as having "an exotic blend of spices reminiscent of medieval brewing." Suggested tasting notes include coriander, dried plum, anise, orange, and citrus. This one is brewed with wheat and pale malts; Hallertau Mittelfrueh hops; and orange & lemon peel, dried plum, grains of paradise, coriander, anise, hibiscus, rose hips, tamarind, and vanilla. At 10.3% and 15 IBUs, this is one big, malty, sweet beer. But the real question is....how does it age?

[Cellar Review]  Samuel Adams Imperial White 2012

This one pours into a murky golden-orange body that is super swampy and absolutely filthy. The beer kicks up three-plus fingers of thick, creamy, porridge-like head. The head is golden/orange-tinted, and is sustaining like a wheat beer. It's impressive for a 2-year old beer. Along with the impressively swampy body and thick creamy head, there are some yeast floaters in the glass. Bright light confirms the same stuff.

On the aroma: huge Twizzlers, Doppelbock-like sweetness, oranges, weird medicinal funk and band-aids, eggnog, and lots of intense spice. I'm pulling out big anise, clove, coriander, and some spicy funk. There's an underlying bready heaviness to the aroma as well. 

Age has done a lot for this beer in terms of mellowing out the taste. I'm getting a lot of that classic apple/raisin/apple juice flavor you get from aged wheat beers. Gone is the cloying sweetness, orange spice, and booze. I'm picking up mild orange, bready notes, grains of paradise, anise, Twizzlers, and tons of bread. It's stuck somewhere between a Wheatwine and an Imperial White...and it really reminds me of the Pipeworks' Elijah's Revival. 

Aging this beer was a good idea, and I'm happy I took the gamble. At 10.3%, this beer was not only originally cloying and sickly sweet, it was also boozy. Now that the cloying and sweet part has dropped off, you are just left with the boozy aspects. As it stands now...the booze is not nearly as noticeable. Palate depth is good and the beer has good duration, but this isn't very complex for the grocery list of ingredients involved. This one kind of flat-lines after the mid-palate. You get big wheat, apples, raisins, Twizzlers, and bready orange and spice up front; that rolls into a huge, sweet, bready middle, with tons of orange and spice; the back end is trailing apple juice, raisins, wheat, and bread. The finish is actually kind of dry and bitter relative to the immense sweetness. This one is full-bodied but nowhere near as full-bodied as it is when fresh.

Rating: Average (2.5/5.0 Untappd)

I'm feeling a Light Average here. This is just okay...I'm happy I cellared it, but this isn't doing much for me. Honestly, I need to revisit this beer fresh, but this is one of those beers that is having a serious identity crisis. It's an Imperial White...so it's not a proper Wheatwine, it's not a proper Wheat Ale, and it's not a proper Belgian Strong. You can get a lot of the notes and characteristic from this beer in other, better beers. But anyway, food pairings here include grilled meats, lamb, and anything with a rustic, raw vibe. Would I recommend cellaring this one? Maybe? I dunno. This beer is divisive and problematic when it is fresh, but it also has some good qualities that are lost in this aged version. Then again, the aged version cuts out a lot of the problematic and cloying sweetness, and that's always a plus. 

Random Thought: The 12oz format here is nice. I can't imagine trying to drink 22oz of of this beer, aged or fresh.